Most Controversial Love Affair Of Iron Lady, Indira Gandhi

It is a known fact that after Rajiv's birth, Indira Gandhi and Feroze Gandhi lived separately, but they were not divorced. The book "The Nehru Dynasty" (ISBN 10:8186092005) by K. N. Rao states that the second son of Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze Gandhi. He was the son of another Muslim gentleman named Mohammad Yunus. Interestingly Sanjay Gandhi's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka took place in Mohammad Yunus' house in New Delhi. Apparently Yunus was unhappy with the marriage as he wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay Gandhi died in plane crash. In Yunus' book, "Persons, Passions & Politics" (ISBN-10: 0706910176) one can discover that baby Sanjay was circumcised following Islamic custom. It is a fact that Sanjay Gandhi used to constantly blackmail his mother Indira Gandhi, with the secret of who his real father is. Sanjay exercised a deep emotional control over his mother, which he often misused. Indira Gandhi chose to ignore his misdeeds and he w as indirectly controlling the Government.

When the news of Sanjay Gandhi's death reached Indira Gandhi, her first question was "Where are his keys and his wrist watch?". Some deep secrets about the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty seems to be hidden in those objects.The plane accident was also mysterious. It was a new plane that nosedive to a crash and yet the plane did not explode upon impact. It happens when there is no fuel. But the flight register shows that the fuel tank was made full before take-off. Indira Gandhi using undue influence of PM's office prohibited any inquiry from taking place.

So, who is the suspect? The book "The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi" by Katherine Frank sheds light on some of Indira Gandhi's other love affairs. It is written that Indira's first love was with her German teacher at Shantiniketan. Later she had affair with M. O. Mathai (father's secretary), then Dhirendra Brahmachari (her yoga teacher) and at last with Dinesh Singh (Foreign Minister).

# Not much known, Sanjay was originally named as Sanjiv that rhymed with Rajiv, his elder brother's name. Sanjiv was arrested by the British police for a car theft in the UK and his passport was seized. On Indira Gandhi's direction, the then Indian Ambassador to UK, Krishna Menon misusing his power, changed his name to Sanjay and procured a new passport. Thus Sanjiv Gandhi came to be known as Sanjay Gandhi.

# Cannot understand the agenda or motive behind bringing out the negative aspects of our past leaders who are dead and the author seems to have forgotten the basic ethic of not speaking ill of the dead, however dreadful their activities might have been. This is a clear case of ‘mud-slinging' by some opposition party or parties. It must be understood that I am not a Congressman nor I intend to vote for the Congress in the next elections.

# Let us forgive and forget the deeds or misdeeds of dead members of Nehru family. what about living people,why Priyanka or Bianca married a christian not a Hindu? Why Raul or Rahul is not married yet? is he going too be a brahmachari or he not got that!!! He planned to become PM then marry the foreigner,is it not? Alas Now his dreams are gone. I doubt his offsprings may be growing in Italy !!

# Democracy is an important part of our country, we have to put it to apt use. We have witnessed that Nehru's Dynasty not interested to serve the people very much. They have many other things to protect. How can they ever concentrate on India's developments. The power of democracy is yet to come, Why AAP Party came to light, Because people fed up up with current political system. Power of democracy has skilfully used recently by Aam Aadmi Party. Debutant Aam Aadmi Party's victory in the recent Delhi Assembly elections has set a good example of the strength of democracy in India. They have many miles to go but the ice has been broken and the dire need to witness some administrative reforms, can't be denied.

# Most of the points raised and presented are verifiable facts. It's only for a curious ardent researcher to find out its details by spending hie/her time and enrgy with an open mind. I notice few commenters here asking for proof. Perhaps their devotion with the dynasty based on reverence built over time by superficial media veneration is hurt. One mustn't have a fixed mindset that doesn't suit a researcher. There are plenty of books that are available, some of them were banned during the dynasty rule. Now these might be made available unhindered. Hence in the interests of truth, one must verify by proper research based on authentic perusal of books and essays.